🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves worldwide. Lawmakers, campaigners, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for other nations.

European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that mobile devices and networks are "taking away our youngsters' childhood". Legislation could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard the young from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the user details of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban is "one of the options in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has called on the legislature to approve a law increasing the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a similar move, including an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has advised parents to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory resolution supporting a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is provided. Even though it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the resolution does not create enforceable legislation.

"A strong age limit is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP driving the initiative.

The UK: An Evidence-Based Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a future ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Previously, interest built behind a bill to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the issue.

Campaign organizations have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who was lost after being exposed to harmful platform posts suggests that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "cliff edge" of exposure when users become eligible.

"The Australian ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build products and services that are safe and fit for children," stated a influential peer.

America: A Decentralized Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely unfolding at the local level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah demands parental consent for under-18s to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with extra time requiring adult consent.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some figures to copy this path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are similarly considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world bodies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has warned that social media bans carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The body points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "replacement" for social media firms to invest in user protection.

Even as this international conversation continues, the policies of this nation and several other countries demonstrate that states globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to make changes on their own.